Self-publishing is on the rise. It
is a force to be reckoned with, illustrated by the increasing presence of traditional
publishers buying or creating their own self-publishing subsidiaries. More and
more self-published books are finding their way onto the NYTBS list, and are
sparking viral interest in readers around the globe. The reign of the
gatekeepers is coming to an end.
Yet the nattering continues. Over
and over you will hear that self-published books are only those that were
repeatedly rejected by traditional publishers, and rightly so. Self-published
books are frequently panned for having disjointed stories, typographical
errors, misspelled words, horrible grammar and badly in need of editing. To
this I say:
Sometimes.
But not always. Lumping all
self-published books into this category of the unpolished and unwashed is just
like lumping all traditionally published books into a category of stunning
success; neither is true across the board. What is true is that a traditionally
published book may have more eyes
proofing it, more minds evaluating it, and therefore may have a better chance of being well-written and grammatically correct.
But that does not mean
self-published books will not.
Enter the IndiePENdents. This is a non-profit
organization that has taken on the daunting task of evaluating self-published
books for basic standards of spelling, grammar, punctuation and formatting. In
a recent e-mail, they encapsulated their efforts:
We
began in December 2011 and a year later acquired a 401(c)3 non-profit status.
In the meantime, we have been evaluating self-published books to separate the
chaff from the worthy ones to recommend to the public. We work in teams of volunteer
evaluation panels; our membership is free, writers don’t pay any fees, and our
judgment is therefore without any bias. Those titles which meet our basic
standards are given a Seal of Good Writing, and published in a catalog under
the title Well Written, Well Edited, Unknown
Books.
In this grass-roots way,
self-published books may acquire a first step of legitimacy not normally
available in the DIY universe. I applaud the IndiePENdents’ dedication to the
craft and their willingness to start this conversation about standards in a free-for-all
landscape. It’s a much-needed effort, and all the more validating because it
comes from this non-profit, non-paid, volunteer group.
Unfortunately, the unpaid volunteer
staff of the IndePENdents is no match for the cascade of self-published books
that now swamp the reading world. They need our help. In a couple of weeks,
they will launch a Kickstarter campaign to raise a modest $1,000 in order to
print and mail their catalog of Well Written, Well Edited, Unknown Books to libraries everywhere. This is a
worthy effort, and if you are an indie writer or enjoy indie books, I encourage
you to check out their web page and join in the Kickstarter campaign once it
gets going. I will post more about it as the campaign develops.
What do you say? Want to read good books but not be
confined by the “old guard” gatekeepers?
Support IndiePENdents!
No comments:
Post a Comment